landfilldesign.com
Leakage Rate Through Composite Liner - Design Calculator

 

Problem Statement

This calculator computes the rate of leakage through defects in a composite liner, i.e. geomembrane/CCL or geomembrane/GCL. The thickness of a CCL is between 0.3 to 1.5 m whereas the thickness of a hydrated GCL  depends on the compressive stress applied during hydration. Typical values are between 5 and 10 mm; or in the order of 100 times less than the thickness of a CCL. Field evaluation, sponsered by USEPA, of leakage rate for double-lined landfills indicates that GM/GCL composite liners outperform GM/CCL liners (Othman et al.,1998.)

The rate of leakage through a geomembrane liner due to geomembrane permeability is negligible compared to the rate of leakage through defects in the geomembrane (Giroud and Bonaparte 1989.) Hence, only leakage through defects will be considered. If there is a defect in the geomembrane, the liquid first passes through the defect, then it flows laterally some distance between the geomembrane and the low-permeability soil, and, finally it infiltrates in the low permeability soil.

Flow between geomembrane and low-permeability soil is called interface flow, and is highly dependent upon the quality of contact between the two components (Bonaparte et al., 1989.) Contact conditions are defined as follows:

Table 1
  Contact quality factor (Cqo) (circular, square, rectangular) Contact quality factor (Cq ∞)  (infinite length) 
Good contact 0.21 0.52
Poor contact 1.15 1.22

The Help model provides guidance for estimating the defect densities (Schroeder et al., 1994). Some useful information on the Help model is given in the Technical Note on Using HELP Model (ver 3.07). There are mainly two types of defects, manufacturing defects and installation defects. Typical geomembranes may have about 0.5 to 1 (1 to 2 per hectare) pinholes per acre from manufacturing defects (Pinholes are defects with a diameter equal or smaller than the geomembrane thickness. The density of installation defects is a function of the quality of installation, testing, materials, surface preparation, equipment, and QA/QC program. Representative installation defect densities as a function of the quality of installation are given in Table 2 for landfills being built today with the state of the art in materials, equipment and QA/QC.

Table 2
Installation quality Defect density (number per acre) Frequency (percent)
Excellent

Up to 1

10
Good 1 to 4 40
Fair 4 to 10 40
Poor 10 to 20* 10
*Higher defect densities have been reported for older landfills with poor installation operations and materials; however, these high densities are not characteristic of modern practice.

Studies by Giroud and Bonaparte (1989) have shown  that for geomembrane liners installed, with strict construction quality assurance, could have one to two defects per acre (4000 m2) with a typical defect diameter of 2 mm (i.e., a defect area of 3.14 * 10-6 m2 ).

Typical for liner performance evaluation one defect per acre (4000 m2) is considered with a defect area of 0.1 cm2 (equivalent to defect diameter of 3.5 mm), for a conservative design a defect area of 1 cm2 (equivalent defect diameter of 11 mm) can be considered (Giroud et al., 1994) 

Problem Solution

Different geomembrane defect shapes will be considered:

    Circular defect with diameter of d

    Square defect with side length b

    Infinitely long defect with width of b

    Rectangular defect with width of b and length of B

Q Leakage rate through the considered geomembrane defect (m3/s)
Q* Leakage rate per unit length of geomembrane defect (m3/s.m)
A Considered geomembrane area (m2)
n Number of defects per considered geomembrane area (A)
Co or Cq ∞ Contact quality factor (see above table 1)
h Hydraulic head on top of the geomembrane (m)
ts Thickness of the low-permeability soil component of the composite liner (m)
d Diameter of circular defect (m)
b Width of defect (m)
B Length of rectangular defect (m)

Limitation of the equations presented (Giroud et al. 1997):

Input Values

Geometry of circular defect
Considered geomembrane area   (A) m2
Hydraulic head on top of the geomembrane (m) m
Thickness of the low-permeability soil (m) m
Permeability of the low-permeability soil (m/s) m/s
Properties of circular defect
Contact (good or poor)
Number of defects (n)
Diameter of defect (d) m

Geometry square defect
Considered geomembrane area   (A) m2
Hydraulic head on top of the geomembrane (m) m
Thickness of the low-permeability soil (m) m
Permeability of the low-permeability soil (m/s) m/s
Properties of square defect
Contact (good or poor)
Number of defects (n)
Side length of defect (d) m

Geometry of Infinitely Long Defect
Considered geomembrane area   (A) m2
Hydraulic head on top of the geomembrane (m) m
Thickness of the low-permeability soil (m) m
Permeability of the low-permeability soil (m/s) m/s
Properties of Infinitely Long Defect
Contact (good or poor)
Number of defects (n)
Width of defect (b) m

Geometry of Rectangular Defect
Considered geomembrane area (A) m2
Hydraulic head on top of the geomembrane (m) m
Thickness of the low-permeability soil (m) m
Permeability of the low-permeability soil (m/s) m/s
Properties of Rectangular Defect
Contact (good or poor)
Number of defects (n)
Width of defect (b) m
Length of defect (B) m

References

R. Bonaparte, J.P.Giroud, and B.A. Gross,"Rates of Leakage through Landfill Liners", Proceedings of Geosynthetics '89, Vol. 1, IFAI, San Diego, California, USA, February 1989, pp. 18-29, 1989.

J.P. Giroud and R. Bonaparte, "Leakage Through Liners  Constructed with Geomembranes, Part I", Geomembrane Liners, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 8, 1: 27-67, 1989.

J.P. Giroud, K. Badu-Tweneboah & K.L. Soderman,"Evaluation of Landfill Liners", Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Singapore, 5-9 September 1994.

P.R. Schroeder, T.S. Dozier, P.A. Zappi, B.M. McEnroe, J.W. Sjostrom,  and R.L. Peton, " The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model:Engineering Documentation for Version 3",  EPA/600/R-94/168b, US. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.(1994)

J.P. Giroud,"Equations for Calculating the Rate of Liquid Migration Through Composite Liners Due to Geomembrane Defects", Geosynthetics International, Vol. 4, Nos. 3-4, pp.335-348, 1997.

M.A. Othman, R. Bonaparte, B.A. Gross, and D. Warren, "Evaluation of Liquids Management Data for Double-Lined Landfills" Draft Document Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1998.

Copyright 2001 Advanced Geotech Systems.  All rights reserved.